Concepts · Across science and technology
Boundary objects
Source-checked draft · v0.2 · 2026-09-24
Prepared with AI assistance; no scholarly reviewer assigned.
For Star and Griesemer, boundary objects meet different social worlds’ local requirements while maintaining a recognizable common identity.
Source: Star, Susan Leigh, and James R · p. 393, introduction of boundary objects
Supporting passage (paraphrased): Objects adapt to different local requirements while retaining a common identity across social worlds.
Access copy or institutional record →Source paraphrase
The core idea
Their museum study explains how participants can cooperate while retaining different meanings and commitments.
Source: Star, Susan Leigh, and James R · p. 393, introduction of boundary objects
Supporting passage (paraphrased): Objects adapt to different local requirements while retaining a common identity across social worlds.
Access copy or institutional record →Source paraphrase
Local flexibility and shared identity
The definition joins two requirements: an object can be adapted to local needs, yet remains recognizable across sites. Both are necessary to this account.
Source: Star, Susan Leigh, and James R · p. 393, introduction of boundary objects
Supporting passage (paraphrased): Objects adapt to different local requirements while retaining a common identity across social worlds.
Access copy or institutional record →Source paraphrase
Objects and organized work
On the same page, the authors connect museum work to standards of collection and description before introducing boundary objects. Coordination involves organizational practices as well as shared objects.
Source: Star, Susan Leigh, and James R · p. 393, discussion immediately preceding the definition
Supporting passage (paraphrased): Connects collection and description standards with management of scientific work.
Access copy or institutional record →Editorial guidance
Editorial caution
Calling an item shared does not establish that it functions as a boundary object. An analysis needs evidence of its local uses and maintained common identity.
Source paraphrase
Example from the literature
The Museum of Vertebrate Zoology case connects cooperation across participants with shared objects and standardized collection practices.
Source: Star, Susan Leigh, and James R · p. 393, introduction of boundary objects
Supporting passage (paraphrased): Objects adapt to different local requirements while retaining a common identity across social worlds.
Access copy or institutional record →Start reading
Star, Susan Leigh, and James R. Griesemer. “Institutional Ecology, ‘Translations’ and Boundary Objects: Amateurs and Professionals in Berkeley’s Museum of Vertebrate Zoology, 1907–39.” Social Studies of Science 19(3), 1989, 387–420.p. 393, then the surrounding museum case
Begin with the definition, then examine the work arrangements that give it empirical meaning.
Edition & revision record
- v0.2 · 2026-09-24: Added claim citations, source locations, reading levels, and explicit editorial labels; removed exercises.
Suggested citation: “boundary objects,” STS Knowledge Guide, AI-assisted draft, v0.2, 2026-09-24.
Download archived edition v0.9 (JSON)